If you followed the egregious abuse of Brevard’s EEL program, including the plagiarized appraisals that were used to attempt to justify the $25 million purchase of land at Hunter’s Brooke, you might be interested in reading the transcript of what actually transpired when your elected officials on the County Commission were informed of the falsified appraisals by Clerk of the Courts Scott Ellis. Here is the complete transcript in PDF format. A few key quotes are below. Keep in mind that this purchase was the largest land purchase in Brevard County history.

These are reactions from various commissioners upon learning that there is a serious question of fraud in regards to the appraisals. What little concern they exhibit seems highly contrived.

Jackie Colon: And also, with all due respect to that Committee that has those eyes, I think I would feel more comfortable still, with Land Development and Holly, who’s got 30 years of experience in the industry, because I do not consider myself – I’d be a fish out of water when it comes to those kinds of discussions. That discussion will be held for another day, because those are the kinds of things that we all have to be very clear. I am very supportive of the fact that we have been able to identify a piece of property with that much land; and the connectivity is what’s exciting, because it’s not just being able to look at that. So, I know personally…I’m very supportive of it. That discussion you’re hearing about appraisals, that’s coming back….. don’t want to muddy the waters, very concerned, very concerned, in regards to how we’re doing these kinds of appraisals.

It’s exciting, she says, that they’ve been able to identify this piece of land, and she’s “very supportive” of that fact, but she’s concerned about the appraisals.

Helen Voltz: Yes, thanks for bringing this up, Scott. I just now got it, I haven’t had a chance to go through it yet, but certainly, the things that you talked about I think are very important, and while I think this may be a good purchase, I’m not so sure that I’m ready to make a decision, because I was in full support of it – I’m probably going to support it eventually – but, I think the fact that we all know that appraisals are not scientific, I mean, we know that. The Program is scientific, and so, we have to match the two of those up, but some of the things that Scott brought up, I feel like I was blindsided today in that, you know, not knowing some of the things, because I certainly – I mean there’s a lot of information here reading the appraisals without something that I chose to do – I assume staff is going to be looking at that.

She just found about the appraisals, but she’s probably going to support it anyway. But she doesn’t read appraisals because she “assumes” staff is looking at those. On a $25 million purchase? How do you show up for a meeting and get “blindsided” when the reports were available for her prior review? Laziness? Incompetence?

Despite the vote to delay the purchase based on the evidence of forged appraisals, the county voted to make the purchase two weeks later.